Skews v. Vancleave
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court, Bessemér Division. Tried before Hon. Jas. J. Banks. The error assigned and insisted on is the overruling of a motion to strike the claim of exemptions from the file. The case is stated in the opinion. cited, Balkupi v. 'Strauss, 100 Ala. 207, Collins v. Baldioin,'109 Ala. 405; Robertson v. State, 7 West Rep. (Ind.), 481, 488; S. C. 10 N. E. Rep. 582, 588. cited, Guilford et al. v. Reeves ■ el al., 15 So. 661-2.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLELLAN, J.
The sole question in this case is whether a defendant in garnishment may interpose a claim of exemption to the money admitted by the garnishee to be owing after he,, tlei defendant, lias given bond for the dissolution of the. garnishment .under the act of February 12, Í891, (Acts, ’1890-91,. p, 500,) and the garnishee has paid the money.oyer, to,the defendant. We regard this question ás being substantially settled in the affirmative by'the decisión, of this coiirt.in.the case *419of Guilford et al. v. Reeves & Co., 103 Ala. 301, where it was held that the statutory claim of a third person to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Guilford v. Reeves & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yeager v. SelfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898