Legal Opinion
Rock v. BAE Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 2014No. 13-13196PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Per curiam
Randel Rock, appearing pro se, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his complaints, which alleged violations of the Interstate Stalking Punishment and Prevention Act (“ISPPA”) and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). Ruling in favor of Rock’s former employer, BAE,1 the district court dismissed the ISPPA claim because that státute did not provide for a private right of action, and dismissed the RICO claims because Rock’s alleged business or property injuries were not the result of the claimed RICO predicate acts, and thus he lacked standing to sue under RICO.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- GJR Investments, Inc. v. County of EscambiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cain v. Christine Valmy International School of Esthetics, Skin Care, & MakeupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Andrew Gressett v. New Orleans CityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- Green v. Morningstar, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- HUMPHREY v. PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- HUMPHREY v. PENNSYLVANIA COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.