Legal Opinion
Wilson & Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corporation
Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided March 11, 1952No. 576PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
194 F.2d 1016
WILSON & CO., Inc.
v.
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORPORATION.
No. 576.
United States Emergency Court of Appeals
Heard at Chicago January 14, 1952.
Decided March 11, 1952.
Louis R. Simpson, Chicago, Ill., for complainant.
George Arthur Fruit, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom J. Gregory Bruce, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for respondent.
Before MAGRUDER, McALLISTER and LINDLEY, Judges.
LINDLEY, Judge.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Funkhouser v. J. B. Preston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. AbramsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Riverview Packing Co., Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Reconstruction Finance Corp. Appeal of Riverview Packing Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Bass. Bass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- H. P. Coffee Company v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.