McSkimin v. Knowlton
New York Court of Common Pleas
At chambers. Plaintiff, McSkimin, obtained a judgment against defendant, ICnowlton, and instituted supplementary proceedings against him. Plaintiff now moves that defendant be punished for contempt for an alleged violation of the injunction order served on him in such proceedings.
1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.
From an examination of the affidavits submitted it appears that the judgment debtor is a photographer, doing nearly all his own work; that he had collected certain moneys after the service of the injunction order upon him, but which were earned within 60 days next before the service of such order; that he is a married man, having a family to support; that the moneys so collected were used for the absolute needs of his family; and the question is whether money earned by a photographer doing his own work, and having little or no assistance in the business, comes within an exemption contained in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dayton v. EwartMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- Dayton v. EwartMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re DziedzicUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 2009