Legal Opinion
Cline v. City of Boulder
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 10, 1969No. 23573PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
This action arises out of the involuntary annexation and rezoning of certain property by the City of Boulder pursuant to the Municipal Annexation Act of 1965, 1965 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 139-21-1 through 23. The landowners, Kenneth and Jean Cline, were the plaintiffs below and are the plaintiffs in error here.
The land in question is an enclave, being completely surrounded by the City of Boulder. It has been owned by the Clines for several years. The county had zoned a portion of the land as Commercial and the balance as Multi-Family.
The Cline property having been in enclave for the three years…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City and County of Denver v. StackhouseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Geneva Inv. Co. v. City of St. Louis, Mo.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
- City of Westminster v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Rogers v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
- Williams v. Village of Deer ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by25 opinions
- Jordan-Arapahoe, LLP v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- National Advertising Company v. The City and County of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Harding Academy v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- University of Colorado v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- P-W Investments, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.