Legal Opinion

Hyde Construction Company, Inc., Cross v. Koehring Company, Cross Vardaman S. Dunn v. Koehring Company

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1977No. 75-1261 and 75-1327PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before GODBOLD and HILL, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

Only one issue in Koehring’s petition needs to be addressed. Koehring asserts that the panel opinion made a factual finding that an assignment existed from Hyde to Dunn, 546 F.2d 1193 at 1202, though no copy of such an assignment was ever found and its existence was never proved. A part of the opinion can be so construed and should be clarified.

What happened was this. In a letter to Koehring’s Oklahoma attorney, Koehring’s house counsel said that he was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vardaman S. Dunn v. Koehring Company, Hyde Construction Company, Inc., Cross v. Koehring Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,777, 11 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 781 Chemetron Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. Business Funds, Inc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Royal Oil Co., Inc. v. WellsMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  3. William (Bob) Brown v. Wiley C. Edwards and All Other Constables in the State of MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Doleac Elec. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Cochrane v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API