Legal Opinion
Schoenmetz v. Ingham
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1996No. 96-CV-461APublished
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ARCARA, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On July 12,1996, petitioner, Wilhelm Seho-enmetz, filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, seeking review of a decision by respondent, John J. Ingham, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service (“INS”), denying petitioner’s request for parole pending completion of exclusion proceedings against him. Petitioner requests an order from this Court directing his immediate release on parole. Both parties were provided with an opportunity to brief their respective positions and oral argument…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joseph Bertrand v. Charles Sava, Laissez-Moi Vigile v. Charles SavaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Moises Garcia-Mir v. William French SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Amanullah v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Saboet Elmazi Azizi and Feim Azizi v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Roman Marczak and Ryszard Kowalczyk v. Joseph R. Greene, District Director of U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.