Legal Opinion

Heidi Associates v. Lawyers Title Insurance

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order reversed, with costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action of the complaint granted and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on said cause of action denied. Certified question answered in the negative. We *1044agree with so much of the dissenting memorandum of Justice Ernst Rosenberger at the Appellate Division (112 AD2d 844, 847-850) as concluded that the in rem proceeding upon which plaintiffs claim is based is not a separate encumbrance from the tax liens to which the defendant title insurer had duly excepted. Given those exceptions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Heidi Associates v. Lawyers Title InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Inavest Enterprises v. TRW Title Insurance of New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Forrest Equities LLC v. Old Republic Natl. Tit. Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API