Julius v. Callahan
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant Jordan from ah order of the district court for Waseca county, Buckliam, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
This was an action to enforce a mechanic’s lien for labor performed by plaintiff for the firm of Callahan & Cotter, contractors, in the erection of a house for defendant Jordan. Lairdorton Company appeared in the action, and claimed a lien for material furnished to Callahan & Cotter for the erection of the same building. The assignments of error are unnecessarily numerous, oft*155en mere repetitions, and but very few of them require special notice.
1. Both Callahan and Cotter were impleaded as defendants, and it is alleged in the complaint and admitted by the answer that they were copartners. The…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Cooney v. FooteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- State ex rel. Getchell v. O'connorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Barth v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Hays v. HaysIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
- Carr-Cullen Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.