Legal Opinion

McCammon v. Akers

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 6, 1968No. 93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Complainant, T. E. McCammon, filed this original bill in chancery averring the defendant, Eddie W. Akers, was asserting ownership and barring the nse of a right-of-way through property owned by the defendant. From *704the chancellor’s decree sustaining the original hill and enjoining the defendant from obstructing or interfering with complainant’s use, possession and enjoyment of the said right-of-way, defendant has appealed.

The proof shows that both complainant’s and defendant’s property comes from a common source. At one time W. E. McCammon, father of the complainant, owned both tracts of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. WaldenTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McGiffin v. City of GatlinburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beck v. MangelsCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. Morris v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  3. Hill v. BeaverCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. James L. Peach, et ux. v. Robert Wesley MedlinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API