Legal Opinion
United States v. Espudo
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 19, 2013No. Case No. 12-CR-236-IEGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GRADO’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS CELL SITE AND SIMULATED CELL SITE EVIDENCE
[Doc. No. 1002]
IRMA E. GONZALEZ, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the motion of Defendant Miguel Grado (“Defendant” or “Defendant Grado”) to suppress cell site and simulated cell site evidence. [Doc. No. 1002, Def.’s Mot.] For the following reasons, the Court DENIES the motion.
BACKGROUND
This case involves charges of conspiracy, racketeering, illegal drug distribution, extortion, and money laundering in connection with the Mexican Mafia prison gang and several affiliated Sureño street gangs…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- United States v. William WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- State v. PerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Prospective & Continuous Release of Cell Site Location RecordsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
- United States v. William WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.