Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Reading City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1912No. Appeal, No. 330PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 330, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 80, for plaintiff in case of Edward C. Nolan v. City of Reading. Assumpsit on municipal bonds.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 330, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant from judgment of C. P. Berks Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 80, for plaintiff in case of Edward C. Nolan v. City of Reading. Assumpsit on municipal bonds. The case was tried by the court without a jury under the Act of April 22,1874, P. L. 109. Endlich, J., filed the following opinion: I. — Findings of Fact. 1. An ordinance of the city of Reading, approved 7 Aug., 1905, provided for the construction of a sewer in the Fourth House Sewer District of the city, the exact cost and expense thereof to be assessed according to a method prescribed upon the…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the findings of fact and conclusions of law by Judge Endlich.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Miller v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Henning v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Price v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API