Legal Opinion

Sutherland v. Eureka Fire & Marine Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Muskegon; Russell, J. Assumpsit by Alexander Sutherland against tbe Eureka Eire & Marine Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action on a fire-insurance policy which contained the following provision:

“This entire policy * * * shall be void * * * if a building herein described, whether intended for occupancy by owner or tenant, be or become vacant or unoccupied, and so remain for ten days.”

The house covered by the insurance was destroyed by fire on the 17th of April, 1895. It appears that in April, 1894, the house became vacant, and a vacancy per*669mit was issued, running to June 18th, and others were granted from time to time until the 8th of December, 1894, when a 30-day permit was granted, which was the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ranspach v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Erickson v. Ladies of the Maccabees of the WorldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API