State v. DaSilva
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 A jury in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, found Robert DaSilva, Jr., guilty of failure to provide notice of address change as a sex offender, a felony, in violation of §§ 46-23-505, -504(5), -507, and -502(9)(b), MCA (2007), and resisting arrest, a misdemeanor. DaSilva appeals, raising two issues. We affirm and restate the issues as follows:
¶2 1. Did the District Court violate DaSilva’s due process right by instructing the jury as a matter of law that DaSilva’s previous Washington conviction was a “sexual offense”?
¶3 2. Did the District Court err in granting a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State v. Alvin DuncanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ThorpMontana Supreme Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- DaSilva v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- City v. HitshewMontana Supreme Court · 2013
- DaSilva v. O'FallonMontana Supreme Court · 2020