Legal Opinion

State v. DaSilva

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 2011No. DA 10-0323PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 A jury in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, found Robert DaSilva, Jr., guilty of failure to provide notice of address change as a sex offender, a felony, in violation of §§ 46-23-505, -504(5), -507, and -502(9)(b), MCA (2007), and resisting arrest, a misdemeanor. DaSilva appeals, raising two issues. We affirm and restate the issues as follows:

¶2 1. Did the District Court violate DaSilva’s due process right by instructing the jury as a matter of law that DaSilva’s previous Washington conviction was a “sexual offense”?

¶3 2. Did the District Court err in granting a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Garland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. State v. Alvin DuncanMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. ThorpMontana Supreme Court · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DanielsMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  3. DaSilva v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City v. HitshewMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. DaSilva v. O'FallonMontana Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API