Timberlake v. Cox Bros.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZINN, Justice.
Appellee sued to recover the balance due on a promissory note. He alleges this note was made, executed, and delivered to him by appellant corporation, in payment of 43 head of two year old registered Hereford bulls. At the time of the execution of the note in suit, Hal R. Cox was president of the appellant corporation, which fact was known to Timberlake.
It appears that following verbal negotiations between appellee and Hal R. Cox, appellee delivered these 43 head of registered Hereford bulls to Hal R. Cox and A. B. Cox at Turquoise, N. M., on April 30, 1931. At that time, Hal R.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pople v. OrekarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1916
- Safety Car Heating & Lighting Co. v. Gould Coupler Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Yucca Mining & Petroleum Co. v. Howard C. Phillips Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961