Legal Opinion

United States v. 418 57th Street

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 26, 1990No. 748, Docket 90-6197PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

The civil drug forfeiture statute, 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(7) (1988), was enacted as part of the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970 (“the *130Act”). Frustrated in its efforts to curtail the proliferation of illegal drug use in this country, Congress created a statute of enormous scope and potency. The law provides for an action in rem against any conveyance, currency or real property used to facilitate narcotics-related activities. Id. Because it is a civil statute, section 881 imparts comparatively few of the traditional due process guarantees…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Knight v. U.S. Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. 141st Street Corp. ex rel. HershCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Premises Known as 418 57th St., BrooklynDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. All, Right, Title & Interest in Real Property & Appurtenances Thereto Known as 785 St. Nicholas Ave. & 789 St. Nicholas Ave.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. 19 & 25 Castle StreetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Certain Real Property and Premises, Known as 418Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. One Parcel of Property, Located at 755 Forest RoadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Certain Real Property & Premises Known as 63-29 Trimble RoadDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API