Legal Opinion
Anderson v. City University of New York At Queens College
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 14, 2004PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*414In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Waldon, J.), dated July 18, 2003, which denied his motion for leave to file a late claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Court of Claims providently exercised its discretion in denying the claimant’s motion for leave to file a late notice of claim. The court, having weighed the statutorily-enumerated factors, properly determined that the claimant’s delay in filing his claim due to ignorance of the law was not excusable (see…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Qing Liu v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- E. K. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Quilliam v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Light v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Tineo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- White v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Olsen v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Godfrey v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of Delamota v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Feliciano v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.