Legal Opinion

In re Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 16, 2012No. MDL No. 2337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRANSFER ORDER

KATHRYN H. VRATIL, Acting Chairman.

Before the Panel:* Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, defendants in nine declaratory judgment actions seek centralization of this litigation, which is pending in four districts as listed on Schedule A, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. All cases now before us are nearly identical-Royal Alliance seeks to enjoin arbitrations before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) regarding the alleged sale of unregistered securities (in the form of an international currency hedge fund known as the Draseena funds) to defendants by purported…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Ephedra Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2004
  2. In Re Cintas Corp. Overtime Pay Arbitration LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Yosemite National Park Hantavirus LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API