Legal Opinion

Dye v. U. S. Bank National Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 1, 2005No. A05A0612PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Appearing pro se, Steven L. Dye and Keith Muma appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing their appeal on the ground that they failed to complete the record. We find no error and affirm.

This case arose out of a dispute over a bond of over $2.4 million obtained from the Gainesville Redevelopment Authority by Dye and Muma for the purpose of establishing a personal care facility. After U. S. Bank National Association, the trustee for the bondholders, gave notice that it was foreclosing on the property, Dye and Muma *653sought a temporary restraining order to stay the foreclosure…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brandenburg v. All-Fleet Refinishing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Atlanta Orthopedic Surgeons v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Mawhorter v. MawhorterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Ball v. Fulton-Dekalb Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. ACCC Insurance Co. v. Pizza Hut of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Grant v. KOOBYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Vaughn v. FaulknerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Lavalle v. JarrettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. Dye v. US BANK NAT. ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API