In re Hartke
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
' PER CURIAM:
In April 2015, respondent Wayne Richard Hartke was suspended from the practice of law in Virginia for six months. This court issued an order directing Mr. Hartke to show cause why this court should not impose identical reciprocal discipline. Mr. Hartke argues that hé should not be sanctioned at all. We adopt Disciplinary Counsel’s recommendation that we impose identical reciprocal discipline.
I
The following facts were stipulated by Mr. Hartke and the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board. In January 2014, Mr. Hartke attended a Continuing Legal Education (“CLE”) seminar in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Chester W. NosalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re: Emerson v. Briggs, IIIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Wayne R. HartkeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018