Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Sheehan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 51PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. William N. Marr presented a petition in the cause of Albert E. Bigelow and others against Robert C. Sheehan and others for the allowance of brokers’ commissions. From a decree dismissing the petition, said Marr appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

A reference to the opinion as found in 150 Mich. 507 (114 N. W. 889), will aid in understanding the issues here. After that opinion was handed down, William N. Marr presented a claim as a creditor of Calvin A. Cook for commissions. The claim was heard before the circuit judge, who disallowed the claim.

Mr. Marr was sworn as a witness. His testimony was objected to because equally within the knowledge of Mr. Cook, deceased. His claim as testified to by him is as follows:

*90“ I didn’t have to sell the land. I want it distinctly understood that I did not have to sell the land. I was to advertise it,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bigelow v. SheehanMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Longe v. KinneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API