Legal Opinion

Miyata v. Peerless Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 10, 1981No. 80-0105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

After rebuilding a damaged automobile, plaintiffs brought an action to obtain payment from the proceeds of an insurance policy which covered the vehicle. The sole issue is whether, under the facts of this case, plaintiffs are entitled to this insurance money.

Plaintiffs are in the auto repair and rebuilding business. Joyce Williams sent her car to them in March of 1977, after it had been extensively damaged in a collision. The car was insured by Peerless Insurance Co. and, after obtaining approval from its claims adjuster, plaintiffs repaired the car.

A draft for $2,229.22, issued by Peerless…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGraw-Edison Credit Corp. v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  2. Wray-Dickinson Co. v. Commercial Credit Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. The Peoples State Bank of Ellinwood, Kansas, and Marian Isern v. Marlette Coach CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Redfield v. Continental Casualty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  2. Goldstein v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Redfield v. Continental CasualtyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Parkway Bank and Trust Co. v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API