Legal Opinion

Manuel Valencia v. Loretta E. Lynch

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 2, 2016No. 13-70414PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NGUYEN, Circuit Judge:

Petitioner Manuel Valencia, a citizen of Mexico, seeks adjustment of his immigration status under the “grandfathering” exception for beneficiaries of labor-certification applications filed before April 30, 2001. See 8 U.S.C. § 1255(i)(l)(B)(ii). The Immigration Judge and Board of Immigration Appeals denied Valencia’s application for adjustment of status, citing a regulation promulgated by the Attorney General that says, “An alien who was substituted for the previous beneficiary of the application for the labor certification after April 30, 2001, will not be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Matao Yokeno v. Sawako SekiguchiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Kar Onn Lee v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rsf v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API