Legal Opinion

Modesett v. Emmons

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 7, 1926No. 3212PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal is from a judgment for damages against the appellants for the unauthorized arrest and detention of Ike Emmons and the wounding of his wife. The following are, in substance, the material facts:

In 1921 the appellant Modesett was the owner of a large tract of unimproved land situated in San Jacinto county. A number of squatters had settled on that land, among them the appellee Ike Emmons and his family. Emmons had gone upon the land early in the year, and had erected a small house which he and his family were occupying at the time the assault complained of was committed. In December,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murray v. MaceNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sumner v. KinneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. McClenny v. InveraritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Ake v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Johnson v. DailyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Modesett v. EmmonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. AlessandroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Smith v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange v. AlessandroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Singer Sewing Mach. Co. v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API