Legal Opinion

Hogan v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 29, 2019No. 0160/18PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

It would be a non-sequitur to insist on a speedy trial if one were incompetent to stand trial at all, speedily or otherwise. On the other hand, should the incompetency lapse, the entitlement to a speedy trial would concomitantly revive, but on a new and inevitably altered calendar. Its latter-day calculation could not escape the shadow of the earlier incapacity. This appeal presents an interesting interplay between the thrust and counterthrust of speedy trial versus no trial at all.

The appellant, Steven Hogan, was convicted in the Circuit Court for Carroll County by a jury, presided over by…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howling v. State Abongnelah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  2. Covington v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
  3. Lemp v. MajkrzakDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API