Legal Opinion

United States v. Bahr

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided April 19, 2012No. Case No. 2:08-cv-573-MEFPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This cause comes before the Court on four motions — two filed by Defendant Matthew Bahr and two filed by the United States. Bahr’s first motion is a Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Final Judgment Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Relief from Final Judgment. (Doc. # 427.) His second is a Motion to Stay Execution Pending Disposition of Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate. (Doc. #443.) The United States’ first motion is a Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. # 433) and the second is a Motion to Seal (Doc. # 436). For the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API