United States v. Bahr
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
MARK E. FULLER, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This cause comes before the Court on four motions — two filed by Defendant Matthew Bahr and two filed by the United States. Bahr’s first motion is a Motion to Alter, Amend or Vacate Final Judgment Or, in the Alternative, Motion for Relief from Final Judgment. (Doc. # 427.) His second is a Motion to Stay Execution Pending Disposition of Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate. (Doc. #443.) The United States’ first motion is a Motion to Supplement the Record (Doc. # 433) and the second is a Motion to Seal (Doc. # 436). For the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.