Legal Opinion

John Hancock Property & Casualty Insurance v. Scannell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 16, 2005No. 04-P-499Published

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal presents a question of interpretation of the term “household member,” as used in a Massachusetts automobile insurance policy. The background facts, as established at trial, are that the policyholder, David H. Scannell (Scannell), owned a Massachusetts automobile insurance policy, sixth edition, with uninsured motorist limits of $250,000 per person, $500,000 per accident. The policy listed Scannell’s residence as 540 Hancock Street, Quincy, and the principal place for garaging of the insured vehicle as 210 Pleasant Street, Weymouth, a residence owned by Scannell and his wife,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boston Symphony Orchestra, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  2. Hanover Insurance v. LeedsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
  3. Vaiarella v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Foshee v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  5. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. MorelMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API