Legal Opinion
K.S. v. K.H
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 14, 2018No. WD 81436; C/w WD 81447, WD 81450 and WD 81451PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCynthia L. Martin, Judge
In these consolidated appeals, K.H. ("Mother") and R.S. ("Father") appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to K.S. ("Daughter") and A.S. ("Son") (collectively "Children"). Mother and Father each challenge whether a statutory basis existed to terminate their parental rights, and whether the evidence supported finding that termination was in the best interest of the Children. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background1
Mother and Father are the biological parents of Daughter (born September 19, 2012) and Son (born August 9, 2014). The Children were placed…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Richard E. Ivie, Jimmie R. Ivie, LaDonna Small, and Bernard Ivie v. Arnold L. Smith and Sidney B. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- In the Interest of: J.A.R., D.K.R., and A.E.R., Children Under Seventeen Years of Age, Greene County Juvenile Office v. D.G.R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- In the Interest of: J.P.B. M.R.S. v. Greene County Juvenile OfficeSupreme Court of Missouri · 2017
- In re the Interest of K.M.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Interest of: A.M.R., R.H.H. III, and H.H. Juvenile Officer and Guardian Ad Litem v. J.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- In the Interest of: D.T.H., M.J.H., Juvenile Officer v. R.B.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- In the Interest of: K.N.D., D.D.D. and G.N.D. Juvenile Officer, Department of Social Services, Children's Division v. C.K.D. and D.L.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2022