Legal Opinion

Blockton Cahaba Coal Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1928No. 5138PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

The Bloekton Cahaba Coal Company and the Little Cahaba Coal Company brought separate suits under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) to recover an aggregate of $19,285.43, assessed and collected as an excess profit tax on income for the year 1917. That amount was paid under protest, and is over and above what was conceded to be due and paid. The two suits were consolidated, as both corporations were held in common ownership,, and were engaged in mining coal on different parts of the same property, and after trial before the District Judge were dismissed. An appeal was taken,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenport Basin & Construction Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Chase v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  4. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Ripley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. J. K. Hughes Oil Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  2. Guanacevi Mining Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  3. State Consol. Oil Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  4. Alsted Coal Co. v. YokeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  5. Clear Fork Coal Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API