Legal Opinion

Connell v. Wilhelm

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1892PublishedCited by 8 opinions

cited 8 S. E: Rep. 579 ; 25 W. Va. 530; Code, c. 135, s; 1, p. 7; Id. e. 117, s. 8; 11 W. Va. 482, 496 ; 29 W. Va. 213; 2 Dan. Ch’y 1274 ; Ror. Jnd. Sales § 7; 3 S. E. Rep. 372, 375; 26 W. Va. 839 ; 2 W. Va. 502. Catharine A. Connell cited 2 Dan. Ch’y 1025 ; 18 Gratt. 375; 9 W. Va. 680, 687; 32 Gratt. 376 ; 8 W. Va. 301; Code, c. 79, s. 3 ; 29 W. Va. 201; 11 W. Va. 423; 6 Wall. 157, 159, 160.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Judge:

George Wilhelm was in his lifetime the owner of several tracts of land situated in the bounty of Hancock, aggregating’about two hundred and forty acres. On the 11th day of Hovember, 1873, said George Wilhelm conveyed to his daughter, Catherine A. Connell, the undivided one half of said tract of land, his wife, Martha, not joining in said conveyance; and on the 25th day of May, 1880, said George Wilhelm departed this life intestate, leaving his widow, *600Martha Wilhelm, and two children, Joseph Wilhelm and Catherine A. Connell, the wife of Daniel F. Connell, him surviving; and the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kable v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Tracey v. ShumateWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. Washington & Jefferson CollegeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. State v. HatfieldWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Abney Barnes Co. v. Davy Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Fisher v. LynchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. J.A. Wendling, Inc. v. DolderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API