Legal Opinion

David A. Manville & Co. v. Francis Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 9, 1927No. 7569PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

As the Francis Oil & Refining Company is the principal appellee, and the other appellee, George T. Blankenship, is merely a nominal party, we use the term appellee in the opinion as referring to the Francis Oil & Refining Company.

Appellant and appellee entered into a written contract in March, 1922, relative to the sale by appellant of certain shares of the capital stock of appellee. Controversy arising between them, appellee brought action, and was awarded judgment against appellant for $14,380 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Union Cent. Life Ins. v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
  3. Francis Oil & Refining Co. v. David A. Manville & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Massari v. EinsiedlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Continental Nat. Bank of Jackson County v. Holland Banking Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  3. Hennepin Paper Co. v. Fort Wayne Corrugated Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
  4. Koen v. BeardsleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. William Lane, Inc. v. Selby Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API