Legal Opinion

City of Butte v. Roberts

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1933No. 7,081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Defendant was found guilty of violating a city ordinance of the city of Butte. The action in the district court was on appeal from the justice court and by agreement was tried to the court without a jury. From the judgment imposing a fine, defendant appealed.

The ordinance involved was passed in November, 1931, and provides: “Section 1. That hotel runners, stage and omnibus drivers, hackmen, taxicab drivers and expressmen operating vehicles for the transportation of passengers, baggage or express, and plying their respective vocations at any passenger depot or any railroad station in the city…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Williams v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  3. City of Seattle v. HurstWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lindsay v. Mayor of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Napman v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neel v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Jacobs v. Clark County School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API