State v. Heath
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This matter came before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing both parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The defendant, David Heath, has appealed from a trial justice’s refusal to hear his motion for a new trial. After hearing oral argument and examining the memoranda submitted by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues should be decided at this time.
The defendant was charged with burglary in violation of G.L.1956 (1981 Reenactment) § 11-8-1. A trial was held in…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. LevittSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- State v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- United States v. Alberto Cruz FontanezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- State v. FreitasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
- State v. BrouillardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- State v. MalstromSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- State v. ChampionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- State v. LopezSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001