Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Barto

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1925No. 5,610PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

Claiming that the Thompson Meat & Trading Company, a Montana corporation, did not on or before March 1, 1922, file a report showing its condition on December 31, 1921, as required by section 6003, Revised Codes of 1921, the plaintiff brought this action against the defendants, who were directors of that corporation at all the times involved, to recover the amount of an indebtedness due to it from this corporation.

The cause was submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, the essential stipulations of which are as follows: At all the times referred to the plaintiff was a banking…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hertz v. WoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Holcomb v. BoyntonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Continental Oil Co. v. Montana Concrete Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Savings Bank v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Mahoney v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. AbellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Earls v. Chase Bank of Texas, N.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Continental Supply Co. v. AbellMontana Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API