Legal Opinion

Vinyard v. Herman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1979No. 10403PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Brothers-in-law plaintiff and defendant, as equal shareholders, formed a corporation in 1970 to conduct a farm supply business. Plaintiff managed the business, was responsible for all facets of its operation and was paid a salary. Defendant received no salary, did not work at the store, was not directly involved in running it and possessed no key to the emporium. Albeit defendant cursorily and infrequently perused the records, he asseverated that he relied upon plaintiff to advise him on current standings of the affairs of the corporation. In April 1973, plaintiff represented he…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Wood v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Harrison v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. Aiple v. South Side National Bank in St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. Kestner v. JakobeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sours v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. James T. Crues, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Kfc Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Ullrich v. Cadco, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Maugh v. Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Frisella v. Reserve Life Insurance Co. of DallasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API