Legal Opinion

Stylianou v. Ansonia Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff failed to rebut defendant’s evidence that the complained of defect was trivial in that the depth of the caulking joints for the sidewalk slabs was between one eighth of an inch and three eighths of an inch at any given point (see Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976 [1997]). The entirely trivial nature of the defect was established as a matter of law and there was no need to send the case to a jury (id).

Finally, plaintiffs expert report is so lacking in detail as to the slope of the sidewalk flag, where along the alleged slope any measurements were taken and how the alleged…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trincere v. County of SuffolkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. Ulrich Development Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Garcia v. 549 Inwood Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Castro v. PegueroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Lardoutsos v. Lowe's Home ImprovementDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API