Legal Opinion

Tunstall v. M'Clelland

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 4, 1808PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Trimble.-—

M’Clelland brought an action of detinue, in the Shelby circuit court, against Tunstall, for the detention of two slaves. The defendant pleaded non detinet, upon which issue was joined ; the jury found for the plaintiff the two slaves, and ascertained their respective prices, and also damages for the detention ; whereupon the court rendered judgment, that the plaintiff recover of the defendant “ the slaves aforesaid, if they may be had ; but if not, then the prices aforesaid of them, or either of them, as cannot be had together, with the damages…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. FalesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  2. Meriwether v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1824
  3. Whitfield v. WhitfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Cole v. Cole's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1816
  5. Danley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1839

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API