Legal Opinion
Shah v. American Synthetic Rubber Corp.
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1983Published
1Opinion of the Court
655 S.W.2d 489 (1983)
Anil K. SHAH, Movant,
v.
AMERICAN SYNTHETIC RUBBER CORPORATION, Gene Trott and Thomas N. Lamb, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Kentucky.
August 31, 1983.
Allen P. Dodd, III, Dodd & Dodd, Louisville, for movant.
Matthew R. Westfall, Charles Laurence Woods, III, David B. Sandler, Baird, Kirven, Westfall & Talbott, Louisville, for respondents.
MORTON HOLBROOK, Special Justice.
The principal issue in this case is whether the trial court erred in entering summary judgment against movant (plaintiff below) in the middle of discovery depositions in an action for breach of contract and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shah v. American Synthetic Rubber Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Littell v. Evening Star Newspaper Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OffuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Rowe v. Noren Pattern & Foundry Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Drzewiecki v. H & R BLOCK, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.