Legal Opinion

Holloway, Et Ux. v. Sewell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J. —

The bill of complaint, filed by the complainant in the circuit court to foreclose a mortgage, alleged, and the answer admitted, that the defendant executed and delivered the note, and the mortgage to secure it containing stipulations for the payment of interest installments, insurance premiums, taxes and attorney’s fees.

It was charged and denied that there had been failure on the part of the mortgagor to pay taxes for the years 1926 to 1937, to meet the interest payments as they became due and to keep the property insured.

We have given in condensed form those parts of the bill and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. RelfSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  2. Clermont-Minneola Country Club, Inc. v. CouplandSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Long v. HerrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  4. State Ex Rel. East Shore Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  5. First Nat. Bank of Bradenton v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hardyston National Bank v. TartamellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  2. Allstate Mortgage Corp. of Florida v. StrasserDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Rosen v. HunterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Roberts v. J. I. Kislak Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API