Mercer v. . Bullock
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
During the year 1923, tbe defendant was a tenant on plaintiffs’ farm,’ the rent for which amounted to $900 and became due and payable 1 November of tbat year. On 10 September, 1923, tbe farm in question was sold under mortgage, and tbe interveners, trustees of tbe estate of R. H. Ricks, became tbe purchasers at said sale, deed for same being delivered to them on 21 September, 1923, and duly registered seven days thereafter. "Who is entitled to the rent which fell due'l November, 1923, tbe plaintiffs or tbe interveners? Tbis is tbe question for decision.
It is established by tbe decisions in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dixon v. NiccollsIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Page v. LashleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Holly v. . HollySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
- Pate v. . GaitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Kornegay v. . CollierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dixon v. OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Dixon v. . OsborneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth City v. SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Jennings v. . ShannonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of Columbia v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.