Krueger v. Lynch
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentMulroney, J.
(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent. -The majority feel that a number of prior decisions ■ of this court “approach the question -involved here but do not reach it.” I feel'they reach it and are determinative of the question in favor of the appellee. Since the prior decisions were befpr'e rules 50 and 53, Rules of Civil Procedure, we must first note the change which the rules made over the prior statutory requirements.
I. Rule 50 superseded. section .11055, .Code, 1939. The latter section contained the requirement in'part that defendant be served with a notice “stating * * * that unless -he.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boals v. ShulesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Kitsmiller v. KitchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Lockway v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Pendy v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
- Fernekes & Bros. v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.