Bauman v. State Ex Rel. Underwood
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The single issue in this case is whether the charter city of Akron may, by a majority vote of all the members .of the council, amend a zoning ordinance, notwithstanding the fact that the city planning commission has failed and refused to approve such amendment, and the further fact that the zoning ordinance itself provides that it can only be amended by a three-fourths vote when the proposed amendment has not been approved and concurred in by the city planning commission.
The charter is an authority superior to an ordinance in a charter city, and the council cannot, by ordinance,…
2Cited by20 opinions
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Phillips v. CalhounCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Fairmount Center Co. v. ArnoldOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Development Industries, Inc. v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- City of Coral Gables v. PuiggrosDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.