Legal Opinion

McLane v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 31, 1898No. Nos. 11,092-(131)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an. order of the district court for Hennepin county, Johnson, J., sustaining a demurrer to defendant’s counterclaim.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

The complaint alleges that on August 13, 1895, the defendant was the owner in fee of certain described real estate in Swift coun*396ty, and on that day entered into an executory agreement with plaintiff to sell the same to him, and that he agreed to pay therefor the sum of §1,975.50,—$500 in 15 days from that date, and the balance at later dates; that he went into possession, and thereafter on September 11, 1895, paid defendant the sum of $250 on such first payment, and that thereafter on November 18, 1895, defendant wrongfully took possession of the premises, and ousted plaintiff, without his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. DokkoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schick v. SuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Habedank v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Jourdain v. LuchsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API