Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rand v. Rand

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1985No. 84-1379Published

1ConcurrenceCelebrezze, C.J.

I am in accord with the majority. I write separately, however, to emphasize that the decree was valid irrespective of the parties’ agreement. This is so because judicial enforcement of a divorce decree requiring a noncustodial parent to pay support for a child’s religious education neither violates the Establishment or Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, nor does it contravene the comparable provisions of Section 7, Article I of the Ohio Constitution. In re Landis (1982), 5 Ohio App. 3d 22.

It is settled that the custodial parent of a minor child has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Majnaric v. MajnaricOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. In Re LandisOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Neff v. PalmerFayette County Court of Common Pleas · 1956
  4. Hackett v. HackettLucas County Court of Common Pleas · 1957
  5. O'Neill v. O'NeillNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API