Deer Valley Unified School District v. L.P. ex rel. Schripsema
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSLYN O. SILVER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. (Docs. 18 and 21). For the reasons below, the cross motions for summary judgment will be granted in part and denied in part. The Court will affirm the ALJ’s decision that the District committed a substantive IDEA violation, reverse the ALJ’s decision that the District committed a procedural IDEA violation, and order the District to reimburse the parent for costs incurred sending L.P. to Sierra and place L.P. at Sierra at the District’s expense.
BACKGROUND
I. Procedural Background
On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- T.Y. Ex Rel. T.Y. v. New York City Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- L.M. Ex Rel. Sam M. v. Capistrano Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Joseph Park, by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Kyung Hee Park Kyung Hee Park v. Anaheim Union High School District Greater Anaheim SelpaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.