Legal Opinion
People v. Hall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s contention that pretrial identifications of him from photograph arrays and from a lineup were unduly suggestive. Although color photographs and black and white photographs were used in the photographic identification procedure, the manner of their use did not single out the defendant. Four arrays were utilized. One array consisted entirely of color photographs, and the remaining three arrays included only black and white photographs. Defendant’s picture appeared in a black and white array. Further, the fill-ins used…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. HavelkaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. RawlingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BallewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SylvesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. HydeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. KeithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. McGilvaryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.