Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. County of Orange

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2005No. G032270PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SILLS, P. J. —

Chad Salisbury was convicted of felony assault with a hate crime enhancement. He obtained a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and the ineffective assistance of his counsel, an Orange County deputy public defender. On retrial, he was acquitted. Salisbury then brought this action for legal malpractice against the public defender.

The trial court bifurcated the issue of Salisbury’s actual innocence and tried it without a jury; it found Salisbury had not met his burden of proof and entered judgment against him. On appeal, Salisbury contends he was entitled to a jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  5. American Motorists Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Church v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Correia v. FaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Shanks v. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API