Salisbury v. County of Orange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J. —
Chad Salisbury was convicted of felony assault with a hate crime enhancement. He obtained a new trial based on newly discovered evidence and the ineffective assistance of his counsel, an Orange County deputy public defender. On retrial, he was acquitted. Salisbury then brought this action for legal malpractice against the public defender.
The trial court bifurcated the issue of Salisbury’s actual innocence and tried it without a jury; it found Salisbury had not met his burden of proof and entered judgment against him. On appeal, Salisbury contends he was entitled to a jury…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Shaw v. State, Department of AdministrationAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Hicks v. NunneryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- American Motorists Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Church v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Correia v. FaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Shanks v. Dept. of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017