Legal Opinion

Suydam v. Suydam

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 25, 1911PublishedCited by 14 opinions

On bill, &c. On petition for alimony pendente Hie.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Y. C.

The bill in this case was filed for alimony under the Divorce act. P. L. 1907 p. 474 § 26. It does not allege that the defendant without any justifiable cause abandoned his wife, the petitioner, or separated himself from her, but alleges that by reason of the committing of an act of adultery by him, she was compelled to leave him, which she did June 7th, 1911, and since that time he has refused and neglected to maintain and provide for hei. The adultery is said to have been committed at a place away from the matrimonial domicile.

If a husband be guilty of conduct which will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. HarrisNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schiff v. SchiffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Schluter v. SchluterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  3. Poliakoff v. PoliakoffSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. O'Brien v. O'BrienNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
  5. Pierson v. PiersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API