Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 14, 2025No. 126844PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 126,844 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ROBERT EDWARD SMITH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. In assessing whether a delay before trial violates a defendant's constitutional right to speedy trial, courts typically consider four factors: (1) the length of delay; (2) the reason for delay; (3) the defendant's assertion of the speedy trial right; and (4) prejudice to the defendant. But if the length of delay is not presumptively prejudicial, courts do not consider the remaining three factors. 2. In assessing presumptive prejudice, the passage of…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Shawanda L. Hatley v. John/Jane Doe, et al.District Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  3. State v. CherrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. RomeySupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API