Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agnew v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1950No. Civ. 17410Published

1Dissent

VALLÉE, J.

I dissent. The motion of plaintiff was for “judgment on the pleadings herein and the stipulation on file herein and on the ground that no issue of fact remains herein and that the sole issue is one of law clearly entitling plaintiff to judgment herein. ’ ’ It was this motion which was granted. The stipulation reads: “It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the plaintiff and the defendants, above entitled, as to the issues of fact herein and the Los Angeles City Ordinances herein concerned, as follows . . . .” It was then agreed that plaintiff is an electrical contractor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Standard Iron Works v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  2. De Mirjian v. LutinskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API